Preliminary Phytochemical Pharmacognostic Studies on the Different Source Plants of Kadamba
Research article
Anand Kumar
M P1*, Srilakshmi M2
1. Reader &
H.O.D, 2. PG Scholar,
P.G, Dept of Dravyaguna, Dr.B.R.K.R.Govt. Ayurvedic College, Hyderabad.
*Corresponding
author: Dr. Philip Anand Kumar, Reader &
H.O.D, P.G,
Dept of Dravyaguna, Dr.B.R.K.R.Govt.
Ayurvedic college, Hyderabad.
E-mail: philipmudumala@gmail.com
Abstract
Ayurvedic Acharyas had a great
knowledge of the medicinal plants because they used to live near the forests
which are a good source of the natural resources. But now days due to
urbanization, deforestation and industrialization certain medicinal plants have
become extinct and became difficult to make use of them in therapeutics. Hence
demand is naturally increased as there was restriction of entry into forests
imposed to protect the endangering plants.
By increasing demand of such drugs which are considerably less in
availability, by adulteration/substitution of the raw materials has taken its
place creating havoc in the Ayurvedic pharmaceutical industry. Hence the need
is to standardize these herbs through botanical surveys, Pharmacognostical
studies, assessment of the quality material available in particular area of
market etc.
In the present study of Anthocephalus cadamba MIQ (Kadamba), Adina Cordifolia BENTH & HOOK (Dhara Kadamba), Mytragyna
parvifolia KORTH (Dhuli Kadamba), for standardization
collected from different places.
Keywords: Standardization,
Biological assay, Nipa, Nighantu,
H.P.T.L.C, NIN method
Introduction:
Kadamba is a
plant drug that is widely used in many instances in the classical Ayurvedic
texts for various ailments (1,2,3). Charaka mentioned Kadamba to be used as vegetable and fruit (4). Susrutha has described it in first group of sour fruits(5).
History of Kadamba can be traced back to
Vedas, Puranas and Samhita.
There is a reference of root and branches of Kadamba in different books of vedic period. It was used for dantadhavana. In paraskara
Guhyasutra 1/21, Atharva parishista 26/5/1-4, Yajna valkya shiksha 34, Manduki shiksha 4/1 etc., Kadamba has been mentioned. It is mentioned as Nipa in Panineeya Asthadhyayi, Pathanjali Mahabhashya, Gubhilagruhya sutra
and Shulwa Prathishakhya.
Susrutha has
mentioned Kadamba
and Nipa as two different plants. But in most
instances Kadamba and Nipa
are used as synonyms(5).
In Ramayana while describing Chitrakuta, Nipa is
mentioned one among the fruit bearing plants. In Mahabharata while describing Dwaitavana, Nipa and
Kadamba are included among fruit bearing plants. There
is mentioning of Kadamba
tree in Srimad Bhagavata
during the occasion of Kaliya mardana.
It is also told that Lord Sri Krishna was very fond of this tree. Pathanjali in his Mahabhasya,
mentions the Kadamba,
while describing fruit varities. Kadamba was favourite
tree of ancient India.
Inspite of
the above history about the plant, the identity of the plant still remains a
controversy, because many plants are being used as the source plants of Kadamba. Susrutha mentioned Kadamba and Nipa as two different
plants. But latter in the nighantus, they are
mentioned as the synonyms of the same plant. And different nighantus
have mentioned different varieties of kadamba
like Dhara Kadamba, Dhuli Kadamba, Bhoomi Kadamba
Raja Kadamba etc. The source plants available for these include Anthocephalus cadamba MIQ., Adina Cordifolia BENTH & HOOK., and Mytragyna parvifolia KORTH.
To evaluate the phytochemical similarities between these plants, a
preliminary phytochemical study has been carried out
on the above mentioned source plants of Kadamba.
Pharmacognostic Study:
The present Pharmacognostic
study of Anthocephalus cadamba MIQ (Kadamba), Adinacordifolia BENTH & HOOK (Dhara
Kadamba) and
Mytragyna parvifolia KORTH ( Dhuli Kadamba) includes the following.
1. Morphological
Identification
2. Collection.
3. Powder
Microscopic study.
4. Organoleptic
properties.
5. Preliminary
phytochemical analysis.
a.
Determination of the moisture content
b.
Total ash
c.
Acid soluble ash
d.
Water soluble ash
e.
Alcohol soluble extract
f.
Water soluble extract
g.
Determination of PH
Identification:
The
plants were identified properly by their morphological features and are
compared with the standard literature available. The morphological features of
the plants are as follows:
Anthocephalus cadamba MIQ., is a medium sized tree and is identified by its dark
brown bark with irregular woody scales, elliptic oblong leaves, small orange
yellow coloured globose
heads and globose
pseudocarpic fruit.
Adina cordifolia BENTH & HOOK., is a large decidious tree with dark grey bark with exfoliating in
irregular woody scales, orbicular shortly acuminate leaves, Yellow flowers in globose pedunculate heads and
dehiscent capsule.
Mytragyna parifolia
KORTH., is
also a large tree with light grey smooth exfoliating bark with elliptic leaves,
greenish yellow fragrant flowers and an oblong capsule.
Collection
and processing:
Leaves
of the plants were collected and are shade dried and powdered. The powdered
plant materials are used for the study.
Powder
microscopy studies:
Materials
and methods:
The
collected leaves of Anthocephalus cadamba
MIQ,, Adina Cordifolia BENTH & HOOK and Mytragyna
parvifolia KORTH., were
fixed in 3:1 Alcohol: Acetic acid solution and kept for two days. After two
days, the powder material is mounted on the glass slides and is studied under
compound microscope at different magnifications and the following were
observed.
Powder
microscopy of Anthocephalus cadamba:
Isolated
fragments of uniseriate conical hairs either whole or
broken are found. Few, whole unicellular conical hairs, pieces of epidermis of
lower surface with wavy anti clinical walls and stomata,
few pieces of isolated stomata and prismatic crystal of calcium oxalate are
found in the microscopy.
Powder
microscopy of Mitragyna parviflora:
Pieces
of tracheary tissue with vessels and tracheary tissue with helical, calceiform and pitted walls
were found in the microscopy. Pieces of translucent resinous masses, few,
isolated sphaero raphides
of various sizes, pieces of epidermis with parasitic stomata are also found in
the microscopic study.
Powder
microscopy of Adina Cordifolia:
Pieces
of broken tracheary tissue with calciform, reticulate and
broadened pitted elements with attached fibres and
parenchyma, some pieces of parenchyma with polygonal to rounded cells with
intercellular spaces, few translucent resinous droplets appearing are found in
the microscopic study of Adina cordifolia.
Organoleptic characters:
It
involved the identification of the colour, touch, odour and taste. The results are as follows:
Samples |
Colour |
Touch |
Odour |
Taste |
Adina
cordifolia |
Green |
Slightly
coarse. |
Slightly
pungent, causes choking. |
Bitter |
Mitragyna
parvifolia |
Moss green |
Slightly
coarse |
Not
characteristic. |
Slightly
Bitter, Astringent. |
Anthocephalus
cadamba |
|
Slightly
coarse |
Pungent. |
Acrid, causes
tingling. |
Physico-Chemical Analysis:
Determination
of moisture content:
Method:
2 gms of sample is taken in a
previously weighted Petri plates. Petri plates with the samples were kept in
the oven and maintained at 110șc for drying. After 3 hrs Petri plates were
taken out weight was noted down. This procedure is repeated for 4-5 times until
the constant weight is reached.
% of moisture =
difference in weight / weight of the sample X 100
Result:
Anthocephalus
cadamba 4.0%W/W
Adina
cordifolia 3.0%W/W
Mytragyna
parvifolia 1.25%W/W
Total
Ash:
Method:
2 gms of each powder is taken in 3
heated silica dishes to avoid any moisture content. The materials are ignited
to 100ș - 150șC in an electric ignition till the charring of the drug material.
Then it is kept in an incinerator at 50șC, temperature allowed to roll back to
Zero; then it is removed from furnace and cooled in a desiccators
to room temperature and weighed.
Total ash =
weight of residue / weight of the sample X 100
Result:
Anthocephlus
cadamba 5.0%W/W
Adina
cordifolia 5.45%W/W
Mytragna
parvifolia 7.5%W/W
Acid
Insoluble Ash Estimation:
Method:
The total ash,
which was obtained was boiled for 5 minutes with 25ml of diluted hydrochloric
acid, collect the insoluble matter in a ash less
filter paper, wash with hot water and ignited to constant heat.
% of acid
insoluble ash = difference in weight / weight of
sample X 100
Result:
Anthocephlus
cadamba 1.50%W/W
Adina
cordifolia 0.65%W/W
Mytragna
parvifolia
1.5%W/W
Water
Soluble Ash:
Method:
The
total ash, which was obtained, was boiled for 5 minutes with 25 ml of water.
Collect insoluble matter in Gooch crucible or on an ash less filter paper, wash
with hot water and ignite it for 15 minutes at a temperature not exceeding
450șC.
Water soluble
ash=Weight of total ash-weight of insoluble matter
%
of water soluble ash=Difference in weight /weight of sample x100
Result:
Anthocephlus
cadamba 1.0%W/W
Adina
cordifolia 2.18%W/W
Mytragna
parvifolia 1.5%w/w
Alcohol
Soluble Extract:
Method:
5 gm
powder was taken in a volumetric flask, 100 ml of alcohol was added to it and
flask was kept for 24 hrs. The solution was filtered next day and 25 ml of this
filtrate was evaporated in a previously weighed evaporating dish on a water
bath. Later it was dried in the oven at 110 C to remove the traces of alcohol.
Constant weight was noted down.
% alcohol
soluble extractive = difference in weight / weight of the sample X 100
Result:
Anthocephlus
cadamba 20.0%W/W
Adina
cordifolia 12.0%W/W
Mytragna
parvifolia 16.0%w/w
Water
soluble extract:
Method:
5 gm powder was
taken in a volumetric flask few drops of chloroform and subsequently 100 ml of
distilled water was added to it. It was kept for 24 hrs, shaking frequently for
the first 6 hrs. next day the solution was filtered
and 25 ml of this filtrate was evaporated in a previously weighed evaporating
dish on a water bath. Later it was dried in the oven at 110 C to remove the
traces of water. Constant weights were noted.
% of water soluble
extractive =Difference in weight /weight of sample x100
Result:
Anthocephlus
cadamba 10.0%W/W
Adina
cordifolia 10.0%W/W
Mytragna
parvifolia 14.0%w/w
Determination
of pH:
The
determination of pH was carried out at room temparature
of 25șc. Calibration of the apparatus was done using buffer solution to pH7
water soluble and alcohol soluble solutions was kept ready, then the electrodes
were immersed in both the solutions and readings were recorded. The results are
as follows:
SAMPLES |
Ph alcohol |
Ph Water |
Anthocephlus
cadamba |
5.46 |
4.34 |
Adina
cordifolia |
5.63 |
4.53 |
Mytragna
parvifolia |
4.87 |
4.26 |
HPTLC:
HPTLC
was performed to develop phytochemical finger
printing. It was performed using 10 x 10 cm silica gel 60 F254 precoated
HPTLC plates [MERCK, Germany]. 10 ”l Volume of each extract was applied on plates
with the help of Camag linomat
- 5 applicator [CAMAG, Switzerland] fitted with 100 ”l
Hamilton micro syringe. The chromatograms were developed at room temperature in
a 10 x 10 cm twin trough chamber using solvent systems Toluene:Ethyl acetate in a ratio of 6:4 for the etanolic extract of Anthocephalus cadamba MIQ, Adinacoordifolia BENTH & HOOK, and Mitragyna
parvifolia KORTH, respectively.
After
the development chromatograms of saponin were derivatized with 20% Antimony trichloride
in chloroform in a ratio of 20:100ml followed by heating at 110șc in preheated
oven for 10 min. These chromatograms were scanned and evaluated under wave
lengths of 254nm & 366nm using a camag TLC
scanner [CAMAG Switzerland] to get graphical representation of finger prints.
From
the HPTLC finger printing of the three drugs, presence of the saponins as the principle chemical compounds were
identified.
U.V.Visible spectrophotometer:
Preparation
of sample
5 gm
of powder of each viz. Anthocephalus
cadamba MIQ, Adina cardifolia BENTH and HOOK and Mitragyna parvifolia
KORTH were extracted with 100ml Methanol. From the filtrate 3ml of extract is treated
with charcoal and centrifuged.
Scanning
of extract:
50 ”l
of Anthocephalus cadamba MIQ and Adina cardifolia
BENTH AND HOOK diluted
to 3ml with Methanol, while 150 ”l Mitragyna
parvifolia was diluted to 3ml with Methanol. The above extracts were
scanned in the U.V.Visible region i.e
190-700nm using methanol as a plank solution by using Sphectronic
Unicam Helios Spectrophotometer.
It is
evident from the UV graph that the Anthocephalus cadamba MIQ has revealed 4 peaks at wave lengths of 230nm, 235nm,
282 nm and 324-329nm.
Mytragyna parvifolia KORTH exhibits
3 peaks 324 nm- 329nm and
Adina Cordifolia BENTH & HOOK
exhibited 2 peaks between 230-235nm and 324-329nm.
This
shows that the peaks obtained at 324nm to 329nm correspond to the same chemical
content in all the three specimens.
DISCUSSION:
Kadamba has
synonyms such as Kadanbarya, Nipa,
Pavrishenya, Kalambaha, Pulaki, Priyaka etc. all these
indicates that the tree bears fruits which are sour taste which produces horripilation. Flowers are beautiful which attract people
by its fragrance, also blossoms during rainy season, are the specific
characters of Kadamba.
In other words resembling on the characters the homonym names were also given
to Dhara Kadamba. Since Kadamba and Dhara Kadamba bears
synonyms and also morphologically similar characters in some aspects, such as
yellowish orange round flowers with sweet fragrance, fruits which are spear
shaped, also flower blossoms during rainy season. All these indicate Dhara Kadamba is a variety of Kadamba.
Physic
chemical study of the powder of the 3 drugs have been carried out and it was
found that Mytragna parvifolia KORTH
is having higher total ash, acid insoluble ash and water soluble extractive in comparison
to other 2 varieties, while Anthocephalus
cadamba MIQ showed higher moisture content and alcohol soluble extractive. Adina Cordifolia BENTH & HOOK has
higher water soluble ash.
U.V.Visible
spectrophotometer of extracts of 3 varieties of Kadamba
exhibited that the peaks obtained at 324nm to 329nm correspond to the same
chemical content in all the three specimens.
HPTLC
studies revealed that the samples contained saponins
as the main chemical contents.
Conclusion:
From
the preliminary phyto chemical study it can be concluded
that the three drugs being used as the source plants of the Kadamba
are having some similarity in the phytochemical
properties. As the study is only a preliminary work further phytochemical
and clinical analysis of the drugs have to be done to know the proper identity
of the drug.
References
1)
P.V.Sharma,Dravya guna Vol-II, Chaukambha bharath academy 2009, Pg No.41.
2)
P.V.Sharma,Kaiyadeva Nighantu 1978, Chaukambha orientalia, Varanasi, Pg No 958.
3) Shakti M. Gupta, Plant Myths & Traditions in India, 1991, New Delhi, 2nd
edition, Munshiram Manoharlal
Publishers Pvt Ltd, 17p.
4) G.S. Pandey & K.C.Chunekar, Bhavaprakasha Nighantu, 2009 Chaukambha Bharathi Academy
Varanasi Pg No 496.
5)
Kashi nath Sastri, Charaka
Samhitha vol-I vol-II 1962, Chaukambha Sanskrit Samsthan, Varanasi, sutra sthana
4/23,17/108.4/47.
6)
Kaviraj Ambika Datta, Susrutha
Samhitha vol-I,& vol-II 1993, Chaukambha Vidya Bhavan Varanasi Sutra sthana
46/158.
7)
Srikantha
Murthy, Ashtanga Hridaya, vol-I& II 1992, Chaukambha
Sanskrit series, Varanasi.
8)
Nadakarni. K.M.,
Indian Materia Medica vol-I 1982, Popular prakashan Pvt Ltd.
9)
Kirthikar.K.R. &
Basu. B.D., Indian Medicinal Plants vol-II, 1975, Periodical experts, New Delhi,
Pg.No-1250-1254.
10)
Asima Chatterjee & Satyesh Chandra,
The treatise on the medicinal plants vol-V, 1997,
CSIR, New Delhi, Pg.No 74, 75.
11)
S.Raghgunath Iyer, Indian medicinal plants (A compendium of 500
species) vol-IV, 1997, Orient longman,PgNo 120.
12)
R.N.Nayar
& I.C.Chopra, Glossary of Indian medicinal plants
1956, 1986, CSIR, New Delhi,
13)
C.D-Camy HPTLC
Information.
14)
Anand.
Instrumental methods of analysis Willard, Meritt,
Dean, Setlte.
*****